Blog
All tools
Legal

The redline tells you what moved. Bearly tells you what it may mean.

Upload two drafts and get a clause-by-clause change log that keeps exact edits separate from interpretation, risk, and questions for counsel.

Use the tool

Add the current and proposed contracts

Use complete drafts, including schedules and exhibits. Add your role in the deal and the terms you care about most.

Upload the current, approved, or earlier contract version.

Upload the proposed, counterparty, or later version.

Optional: identify your side, priorities, known concessions, and clauses that deserve close review.

Your input stays in this browser through sign-in and expires after two hours. Bearly imports it into a private chat and starts the work automatically.

What it actually does

Useful before impressive.

Contract comparison has two jobs: accurately record the language that changed and explain which business questions the change creates. Collapsing those jobs encourages confident guesses and missed edits.

Bearly preserves both layers. You can inspect the cited clauses, build a negotiation list, compare an exhibit, or draft questions for counsel without treating an AI reading as a legal conclusion.

Worked example

The shape of a good result.

Every result follows the material you provide. This example shows the level of specificity Bearly is aiming for.

Review context

Customer-side SaaS renewal. Prioritize auto-renewal, price increases, data use, security commitments, indemnity, and liability. Flag edits outside the order form.

Change and issue log

Exact change

Liability cap changes from fees paid in the prior 12 months to fees paid in the prior three months (§11.2).

Interpretation

The revised base may materially reduce recovery; the effect depends on payment timing and excluded claims.

New obligation

Customer must provide 60 days' non-renewal notice instead of 30 (§3.1).

Question for counsel

Should the security exhibit control where its incident-notice period conflicts with §8.4?

How it works

Three moves. One conversation.

  1. 01

    Upload both complete drafts

    Schedules, exhibits, and incorporated terms can contain the consequential change.

  2. 02

    Map edits to issues

    Bearly records source language before explaining possible significance.

  3. 03

    Prepare the review

    Turn the cited issues into negotiation points or questions for counsel.

Keep going

The result is not a dead end.

  • Draft a prioritized negotiation checklist.
  • Compare a revised exhibit or third draft.
  • Turn approved terms into an obligations calendar.

Worth knowing

No magic tricks.

  • This is not legal advice or a certified redline.
  • Counsel should review consequential conclusions and the original documents.
  • Scans, missing exhibits, and incorporated web terms can make a comparison incomplete.

Other ways in

More tools, same workspace.

Browse all tools

Compare PDFs

Bearly compares two PDFs for more than different pixels: altered numbers, claims, dates, duties, assumptions, omissions, and their practical consequences.

Open tool

RFP response generator

Bearly maps every requirement, drafts only from supplied facts, exposes unsupported questions, and keeps citations back to your approved material.

Open tool

PDF summarizer

Upload a report, manual, paper, agreement, or book chapter. Bearly gives you the structure and substance, with page references for the claims worth checking.

Open tool

Ready when you are

The redline tells you what moved. Bearly tells you what it may mean.

Start the focused job now. The rest of Bearly will be there when the job becomes something larger.

Add your material